Now that we've had some time to get acclimated to the context of the situation, let's take a look at the ranking to see where we stand in comparison to the other participants. They were the first road map that, at one point in time, had the intention of being put into action at the end of 2022. The developers started talking about changes that would be made to the way that combat worked at the beginning of January 2023, which made players a little excited about the next PTR after the feedback was provided at the beginning of January 2023. Nevertheless, in spite of the fact that they were removed from the leaderboard, the developers did not actually provide real feedback on the actual changes that were made between the months of December and January. When the actual experience of the end user is taken into consideration, we do not believe that there has been a significant change because we do not believe that there has been much of an improvement. From our vantage point, this is an illustration of one of the issues that we have been experiencing. It is to be anticipated that the constraints placed on us by the amount of time available will prevent us from receiving any feedback that can actually be repeated.
This location has an eerie atmosphere that reminds me of Christmas. At first, we believed that this was happening because ags were unable to communicate with one another in an efficient manner. However, now that we have more information, we understand that this PTR cycle will actually become the leaderboard.
The fact that things have gone wrong does not in the least bit bother us, but the fact that they have gone wrong is something that we find to be quite humorous. After the construction of the wall is finished, the first effect will be that the beginning of the war will be delayed, and the second effect will be that there will be a cap placed on the total number of mercenaries. This indicates that only 25 people on one side will be able to engage in combat, while only 10 people on the other side will be able to do so. It was obvious that this was not a very good sign, so the decision was made to put an end to the war as soon as it was possible to do so. The fact that the people who were actually engaged in combat during the conflict were the ones to receive a respite from the fighting during the conflict is obviously unfair. People would say things like, hey, we can enter because because of Mercury, they just think it won't be a problem, and it was made abundantly clear that Merc would be mentioned multiple times in the chat.
People would make statements like, hey, we can enter because because of Mercury, they just think it won't be a problem. People would make statements like "hey, we can enter because because of Mercury, they just think it won't be a problem," but they wouldn't really believe it. They just recently made the announcement that they would take part in the game of Opia Sentinel, and due to the fact that they took part in the game, we were able to successfully run an honest game.
It is surprising to see how many people waste their time trying to game the scoring system, which is the real reason why this page even exists in the first place. As a direct result of this, there are in fact three distinct categories of rewards that can be acquired. Because we have reason to believe that the ranking list that was created by the expedition team itself is the one that is the most accurate and trustworthy, the expedition team is going to be split into two parts as a direct result of this. It is possible that both of them were given prizes, but we are unable to confirm this at this time. There is a possibility that both of them were awarded prizes. We concur with you that it is important to recognize the efforts of those who go above and beyond in this way. We are of the opinion that this will not have the effect of transforming each journey into a contest as a direct result of it.
People who play video games with the intention of obtaining the highest score possible the vast majority of the time should not be the only ones to receive rewards; the statistical model should also be rewarded. This is due to the fact that each team is made up of a different and distinct collection of individuals who are all actively contributing to the team's overall success. They simply move to a more remote region of the map, engage in combat with one another, and then heal one another as necessary.
People who participate in the game in this setting and end up losing will experience a great deal of frustration as well as anger as a direct result of the loss
We have reason to believe that, unless they make more substantial changes to the system, the reward introduction ranking will most likely be eliminated altogether
However, in addition to this, the reward, the title, and the skin will all be removed, and players will be given the option to continue playing without them
This is how we see things
We cannot wait to find out which of the real groups has the highest score and which has accumulated the greatest number of mutations
Both of these things are top priorities for us
If you back something with rewards in order to attract people, there will always be exploiters, but at least they won't be doing it for their own personal gain if you do this
If you back something with rewards in order to attract people to it, then you have the ability to
This holds true even if there are no benefits associated with the behavior in question
We are of the opinion that it ought to be permitted for them to be left unfinished in order to deny them the opportunity to recreate them in a different form
Because we do not have faith in them, we do not believe that they will carry it out as they have stated because they intend to. If it appears that they are not going to be able to complete the task, then it is permissible to take the reward away from them at this point in time. Because we believe that the primary reason why the vast majority of people do not care is due to the fact that the person who will actually receive the reward is only one percent, or possibly five percent, we believe that they may have exerted an excessive amount of effort. Because we believe that the primary reason why the vast majority of people do not care is due to the fact that the person who will actually receive the reward is only one percent, or possibly five percent,This is due to the fact that we have a strong suspicion that the proportion of people who will in fact be awarded the prize is somewhere between one and five percent. The point reward, which can be anywhere from one hundred to five hundred points, is actually well within the realm of what we would consider to be reasonable.
To phrase it another way, we cannot say for certain whether or not AGS is aware of the information that they have obtained because we do not have access to their internal communications. If that turns out to be the case, then they won't have any way of comprehending the player population.
