Similar to the majority of recent FIFA 23 Coins games, the difference is relatively minor, however when the fundamentals are working all you'll ever need is a few tweaks to the system. Furthermore, those adjustments have made FIFA 23 the most pleasant game on the pitch with a smooth passing style and loads of ways to score goals, but not being too heavily weighted on the side of the attackers.
Finding the ideal ways to play and strategies in FIFA 23 can be a good case of trial-and-error particularly if you're not sure about which players are most suitable for a particular strategy. You might have the perfect configuration, but you may have the wrong tactics or players might not be in complete harmony with the way you line your players up on the pitch.
For a long time, 4-4-2 was a staple of English clubs as other teams enjoyed success with 3-5-2. This was before 4-2-3-1 was embraced by the likes of Barcelona and Spain but which formation is best for FIFA?
To help you succeed on the new game, GOAL takes a look at the top formations to use on FIFA 23. The 4-2-3-1 formation is among the most popular formations in FIFA. In every variation of the game it has been utilized by professionals as their main choice due to the defensive and attacking strengths it offers.
The formation uses three CAMS, but the LAM/RAM are actually LM/RMs. This makes it play quite similar to a 4-4-1-1, allowing you to choose to play narrow or wide.
For defense, the 4-2-3-1 can be extremely compact. It is composed of two holding CDMs which offer security, and the formation is easily adaptable with the addition of the 'balanced', or 'get forward instructions on a CDM you could make your player more attacking or more reserved.
The formation lets a team defend with a 4-5-1 formation, with the CAM sitting higher than the other formations like the 4-4-2. That's why it is the preferred formation of many players who want to close out a game with a strong attacking threat.
The 4-4-2 is perhaps the most balanced formation of FUT 23 buy Coins. This tactic employs two strikers, making it somewhat more aggressive than 4-2-3-1, at the cost due to the absence of a cam.
