It's logical in the simplest of terms.

There was some debate about Griffin and Andrew Luck in 2012. as well as a debate on Jameis Winston or Marcus Mariota last year, but this differs.

It is possible that the future for any given player is Mut 24 coins such that it's best to diversify your investment portfolio, as it's more difficult for things to go wrong with an entire group of players. The best way to get useful players out of the draft is not to get the best pick.

The goal is to have the highest number of picks, and to have the most chances to pick players who will not go bust. Then again, at least when Washington made a trade for the No. 2 pick, they were getting a quarterback prospect everybody believed would be successful.

None of the players in this class is a candidate for that. The Rams declare that they want the position of a quarterback, however, pretty everyone agrees that a quarterback is not the most desirable player to be picked in this year's draft, and certainly not among those top three.

Even if you're picking a quarterback, nobody really stands out among the others: Draft experts appear to be fairly evenly divided on which quarterback is the most effective this year is Wentz or Jared Goff.

There was some debate about Griffin and Andrew Luck in 2012. as well as a debate on Jameis Winston or Marcus Mariota last year, but this differs. Those were highly touted prospects fighting to be considered the top. This is a crop of good prospects, and nobody is sure which one is most likely to be the best.

This week, Bill Barnwell of ESPN described how in a lottery-like draft "the most effective strategy is to purchase more tickets." The RG3 deal was possibly the best example of that in the past, but losers of the deal appear to be unwilling to madden 24 mut coins learn that information.